NO ONE LIKE OUR MUHAMMED ALI JINNAH
CHARACTER FLAWED PERSONS TRYING TO FIND FLAWS IN HIM
Spit on the Moon and your own face is slighted
The hypocrisy of the British Government in trying to eulogize Mahatma Gandhi just for gaining access to Indian markets and to make money. David Cameron trying to outdo William Churchill himself. Churchill used to ridicule Gandhi, now the ideas of the icon of Britain is being ridiculed by Cameron himself. Remember it as this so called educated Prime Minister who insisted that it was okay to ridicule the feelings of other ways of life by doing whatever one can. Here the preposterous venom of the French Cartoons.
So much hate material on Pakistan,Islam and our culture. No one sees that but only finds fault with our Ideology. Just Google the hate material. Not only trying to undo our Prophet (PBUH) the greatest man produced by mankind, but Jinnah as well. Trying to prove Jinnah was this and Jinnah was that. You stupid imbeciles, just lust for money is making you ridicule our icon. Spit on your face on and on.
‘No one like Jinnah. A man of character, handsome man, who evolved with time. But one thing about him was that he was INCORRUPTIBLE, and that is marked contrast with the abundant of corrupt people today. Most of these so called juvenile misgots, who are trying to undermine Jinnah for personal gains. Shameless behavior. As a famous person calls them BAYGHAIRAT BIRGADE.
With time either a person goes down, or goes up in the esteem of everyone. The stuff of legends, Quaid e Azam Muhammed Ali Jinnah is our saviour forever. All the time character flaws in the life of Mahatma Gandhi comes up in light, and even the international media masks those flaws. The Government of India paid a preposterous sum to buy the personal letters between Gandhi and his so called Jewish lover. Books repeat the so called hidden stories of his preferences. He is accused of incest multiple times. But this the media or the Bayghairats can forgo, and a man of impeccable character, they are trying their level best to bring down. Spit on the Moon. You know the results!
Man of God.
Hi Dear thank you for the post.
CAN SIKHS AND MUSLIMS LIVE WITH HINDOOS ?
AMBEDKAR SAYS IN “SELECTED WORKS OF AMBEDKAR”,AS UNDER :
The idea underlying Sanghalan is to remove from the mind of the Hindu that timidity and cowardice which so painfully make him off from the Mohammedan and the Sikh and which have led him to adopt the low ways of treachery and cunning for protecting himself.
THE “SELECTED WORKS OF AMBEDKAR”,IS USED BY AMBEDKAR TO QUOTE THE INDIAN ARMY
CHIEF,AS UNDER :
General Mansfield, the Chief of the Staff of the Indian Army, wrote about the Sikhs: ‘ It was not because they loved us, but because they hated Hindustan and haled the Bengal Army that the Sikhs had flocked to our standard instead of seeking the opportunity to strike again for their freedom. They wanted to revenge themselves and to gain riches by the plunder of Hindustani cities. They were not attracted by mere daily pay, it was rather the prospect of wholesale plunder and stamping on the heads of their enemies.
SIKHS HAVE TO NOTE THIS VERSE IN THE GRANTH ! WHO IS REFERRED TO HERE ?
Bhai Gurdas Ji Vaaran – Pannaa 33
ਦੁਹ ਵਿਚਿ ਦੁਖੀ ਦੁਬਾਜਰੇ ਖਰਬੜ ਹੋਏ ਖੁਦੀ ਖੁਆਰਾ।
Out of these two, the mongrels-apparently sadhus but internally thieves–are always in wavering state and, suffering for their ego, go astray.
ਵਾਰਾਂ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰਦਾਸ : ਵਾਰ ੩੩ ਪਉੜੀ ੧ ਪੰ. ੨
ਦੁਹੀਂ ਸਰਾਈਂ ਜਰਦਰੂ ਦਗੇ ਦੁਰਾਹੇ ਚੋਰ ਚੁਗਾਰਾ।
Such double-faced thieves, backbiters and cheats remain pale-faced due to their bewilderment in both the worlds.
WHAT FUTURE DO SIKHS HAVE IN INDIA ?
CAN SIKHS LIVE WITH THE PANWARI BANIA TRASH ?
WHAT DOES AMBEDKAR SAY ABOUT THE BANIA TRASH ? dindooohindoo
The Bania is the worst parasitic class known to history. In him the vice of money-making is unredeemed by culture or conscience. He is like an undertaker who prospers when there is an epidemic. The only difference between the undertaker and the Bania is that the undertaker does not create an epidemic while the Bania does. He does not use his money for productive purposes. He uses it to create poverty and more poverty by lending money for unproductive purposes.
Noted