OBSESSION OF RESTORING MANDIRS, GURUDWARAS,
IN LAHORE BY PAID AGENTS OF FOREIGN LOBBIES,
WHILE INDIA RUTHLESSLY DESTROYS MORE MASJIDS.

The motivation of various people is suspect. Running about everywhere in search of fallen Mandirs and Gurudwaras with no historical significance. It not only amuses me, it irritates me. Taking the name of Masjids or Muslim leaders attached to Lahore is repugnant to them. Greed certainly plays a part, when you are on the payroll of foreign lobbies, but there is something more sinister involved in this action.It takes us back to an old plan of breaking Pakistan further and making a Grand Punjab State, mixed with the Sikh Punjab on the other side. And then our so-called Pakistani leaders will become the Maharaja Ranjit Singh of our century.

A proud assertion is that the haveli of Ranjit Singh is being restored. It is the same place where he had to murder his own mother for various wrong doings. Lahore was ruled by three Sikh dacoits, making life miserable for the citizens of Lahore. So the city leaders decided to invite another dacoit of Gujranwala to come to Lahore and take over the city. They view one dacoit better than many dacoits. So the city gates were opened for him. The Kotwal first opened Lawari Gate, then even the original Delhi Gate. The present one is a later construction by Muhammed Sultan tekaydar. The details are everywhere in historical books, but people prefer to forget them. Ranjit Singh’s army was camped in the Baradari of Wazeer Khan.

It boils down to the original nature of Two Nations. This Divide and Rule policy started by the creation of a lot of fake stories. Conspiracies were created all the time. The bullshit of a Shiv Temple underneath the Babri Masjid. It led to the demolition of a Masjid in hands of fanatic extremisms. There was no  archaeological evidence for the same. Here in Lahore the bullshit was of LOH temple in Lahore Fort. Even the most moronic researcher can see a small construction of Sikh British period posing as a building 3000 years old. See notes by able historians to check reality of same.

Munshi Muhammed Din Fauq says:

A startling narration is done by Munshi Muhammed Din  Fauq in his book “Aed i Mughlia” Lahore published in 1927. He says that the Hindu lobby represented by Sanatan Dharm Yudal Saba communicated (for some period) with the British authorities in Lahore and as a result of their pressure the Superintendent Archaeology accompanied them to a supposed site of the Mandir. The Sanatan Dharm members were present when they visited the site on 11th December, 1923. Nothing was visible. Digging was proposed. It was found that under two feet of a debris a gumband could be seen and the area was ordered to be cleared and the surface floor reached, which was on level with the ground of Hazuri Bagh. But the startling find on 13th December, was different in all ways. Remains of a GIANT of a person were discovered in it. It was a person much larger than the present generation. Fingers of the hands were discovered which were so large as to be unbelievable. Very sharp teeth were discovered there too. It was the grave of a giant. Sanatan Dharm people were of the view that the bones were of Loh, son of Ram. The Archaeology department could only say that these were Pre-Buddhist era bones. But what about the architecture of the structure itself?Professor Ahmad Hasan Dani, the brilliant archaeologist says same.

In 1973 the legendary scholar of Pakistan Ahmad Hasan Dani delivered a lecture on “Al-Beruni” in the city of Kabul. Amazing that Kabul is seen as hosting a Pakistani scholar. But Kabul was a city of intellect and arts for a long time. Not surprising that it happened then. Dani Sahib in his erudite way explains everything. His dismisses the so-called connection of Loh son of Ram with Lahore and we attach the paragraph on same. Worthy of being read. But most interesting he isolates different Lahores and capitals and names. And he says that the city was founded near the river IRAWATI (present Ravi), and that is why it was called IRAWATIAWAR. It was later modified with use as RAVAWAR. He says Panini’s grammar tells us that RA and LA are interchangeable grammarian words, and that is why we have the word LAHAWAR, or presently LAHORE itself. Lahore is simply by tradition CITY ON RAVI.

THE WHOLE DETAILS CAN BE READ IN HIS ARTICLE ON LAHORE.
A news appeared in the press recently that the present set up is undoing all names related to stature of Muslims in Lahore, and will go back to those names, in particular those who invaded Lahore, and carry multiple names. It seems the idea is that the two nation theory can be checked in progress by renaming things. It has been tried in India too, and India is ready to create new Pakistans. But this Pakistan is here to stay. Hands off our city! Lahore is Lahore, and no amount of falsifications can undo our character.